SMILES:
C1=CC=CC=C1C=O
Aroma Description:
sharp, sweet, bitter, almond, cherry1
| Receptor | Expression | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR5P3 | 100 | - | (agonist) 5 | ||
| OR6P1 | 65 | - | (agonist) 5 | ||
| OR1G1 | 61 | - | 5.5838 2 | sweet, waxy, citrus, fresh, tart, orange, aldehydic, floral, rose, fatty | |
| OR52D1 | 100 | - | 3.0457 2 | dairy, cheesy, anise, milky, creamy, sour, sharp, peach, lactonic, rancid | |
| OR4K2 | 100 | - | 1.9231 3 | clove, animal, cortex, sweet, foliage | |
| OR5I1 | 46 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR1D5 | ? | - | -2 4 |
SMILES:
C1=CC=CC=C1C=O
Aroma Description:
sharp, sweet, bitter, almond, cherry
| Receptor | Expr.% | Agonist? | Dock Score | Known agonist | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
3.) Ashti Baghaei, K. (2015). Large scale analysis of olfactory receptors with highly genetically variations in relation with specific anosmia (Doctoral dissertation, Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Diss., 2013).
4.) Kyung Ho Kim, Jai Eun An, Myoungjoo Riu, Jin-Soo Son, Sung Eun Seo, Hongki Kim, Gyeong-Ji Kim, Soohyun Lee, Jin Yoo, Tae Shin Park, Yong Hwan Lee, Tai Hyun Park, Choong-Min Ryu, Oh Seok Kwon. Receptonics-based real-time monitoring of bacterial volatiles for onsite fire blight diagnosis. Sensors & Actuators: B. Chemical 419 (2024) 136337
5.) Roger EmterAndreas Natsch Modified olfactory receptors WO2024126820A1