SMILES:
CC(=O)CCC1=CC2=C(C=C1)OCO2
Aroma Description:
berry, candy, cotton, floral, fruity, heliotrope, jammy, powdery, raspberry, sweet1
| Receptor | Expression | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR1G1 | 61 | - | 6.3959 2 | sweet, waxy, citrus, tart, orange, fresh, aldehydic, rose, floral, fatty | |
| OR3A1 | 92 | - | 3.8 3 | cork_taint | |
| OR52D1 | 100 | - | 1.8782 2 | dairy, cheesy, anise, milky, creamy, sour, sharp, peach, rancid, lactonic | |
| OR5A1 | 100 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR5A2 | 100 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR5AN1 | 100 | - | 0 4 |
SMILES:
CC(=O)CCC1=CC2=C(C=C1)OCO2
Aroma Description:
berry, candy, cotton, floral, fruity, heliotrope, jammy, powdery, raspberry, sweet
| Receptor | Expr.% | Agonist? | Dock Score | Known agonist | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
3.) Christian H. Wetzel, Markus Oles, Christiane Wellerdieck, Michael Kuczkowiak, Günter Gisselmann, Hanns Hatt Specificity and Sensitivity of a Human Olfactory Receptor Functionally Expressed in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells andXenopus Laevis Oocytes Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1999, 19 (17) 7426-7433; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-17-07426.1999
4.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Jun Deguchi, Hu Jieying et al. Diverse yet selective tuning of an odorant receptor for sensing four classes of musk compounds, 03 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1916850/v1]