SMILES:
CC1CC(C2=C(C1(C)C)C=C(C(=C2)C(=O)C)C)(C)C
Aroma Description:
amber, ambrette, fruity, musk, powdery, sweet1
SMILES:
CC1CC(C2=C(C1(C)C)C=C(C(=C2)C(=O)C)C)(C)C
Aroma Description:
amber, ambrette, fruity, musk, powdery, sweet
| Receptor | Expr.% | Agonist? | Dock Score | Known agonist | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Ligand Specificity and Evolution of Mammalian Musk Odor Receptors: Effect of Single Receptor Deletion on Odor Detection Narumi Sato-Akuhara, Nao Horio, Aya Kato-Namba, Keiichi Yoshikawa, Yoshihito Niimura, Sayoko Ihara, Mika Shirasu, Kazushige Touhara Journal of Neuroscience 20 April 2016, 36 (16) 4482-4491; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3259-15.2016
3.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Jun Deguchi, Hu Jieying et al. Diverse yet selective tuning of an odorant receptor for sensing four classes of musk compounds, 03 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1916850/v1]
4.) Aya Namba, Naoko Saito, Michiaki Inoue, Go Toriyabe (2018) Search method of odor control agent by furaneol JP6276555B2