SMILES:
C12=C(C=CN2)C=CC=C1
Aroma Description:
animal, fecal, floral, naphthyl1
| Receptor | Expression | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR5P3 | 100 | -4.4 3 | 9.3496 3 | mimosa, hawthorn, spearmint, coumarinic, hay, sweet, acacia, orangeflower, powdery, naphthyl | |
| OR2W1 | 53 | -4.7 3 | 0.3252 3 | sweet, tart, hay, fatty, coumarinic, orange, peony, cinnamon, herbal, tonka | |
| OR5K1 | 100 | -4.7 3 | 0.122 3 | hazelnut, nutty, peanut, roasted, almond | |
| OR2L3 | 100 | -3.4 4 | 1.9 4 | resinous, acacia, lime, pine, lemon, hawthorn, terpenic, mimosa, coumarinic | |
| OR8H1 | 88 | -4.22 3 | 0.1626 3 | peony, spearmint | |
| OR1G1 | 61 | - | 1.7766 2 | sweet, waxy, citrus, tart, orange, fresh, aldehydic, rose, floral, fatty | |
| OR52D1 | 100 | - | 0.4569 2 | dairy, cheesy, anise, milky, creamy, sour, sharp, peach, rancid, lactonic |
SMILES:
C12=C(C=CN2)C=CC=C1
Aroma Description:
animal, fecal, floral, naphthyl
| Receptor | Expr.% | Agonist? | Dock Score | Known agonist | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
3.) Aya Kato, Naoko Saito (2015) Odor control agent. JP5798382B2
4.) Masato Murai, Ikuo Terada (2022) Method for screening of unpleasant odor masking agents US20220034866A1