
SMILES:
C1=CC=C(C=C1)C=CC=O
Aroma Description:
sweet, spicy, candy, cinnamon, warm1
Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Hypothesized PQ | Associated Perceptual Qualities (PQs) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR2J3 | -6 2 | 2 6 | jagged7 |
warm, candy, cinnamon, currant, hay, foliage | |
OR1N1 | -5 2 | - | candy, warm, cinnamon | ||
OR3A1 | -5 2 | - | cyclamic-newspapery7 |
cork_taint | |
OR2W1 | - | 10 6 | allyl-demimetallic7 |
herbal, fatty, sweet, tart, banana, mushroom, orange, fresh, rancid, cherry, acacia, orangeflower | |
OR1G1 | -4 5 | 0.2538 3 | waxy7 |
waxy, orange, tart, aldehydic, sweet, clean, citrus, fresh, anise, dusty, fruity, medicinal, fatty, oily | |
OR10AG1 | -4 2 | - | candy, warm, cinnamon | ||
OR2G2 | -4 5 | - | granular | currant, cotton_candy, candy, strawberry, chocolate, warm, vanilla, cinnamon, berry | |
OR2M4 | -4 5 | - | sweet | anise, naphthyl, narcissus, anisic, currant, candy, apple, warm | |
OR2T10 | -4 5 | - | fruity | cotton_candy, bergamot, strawberry, currant, lime, lavender, berry, candy | |
OR2T34 | -4 5 | - | melonous | currant, marine, apple, ozone, candy, plum, anise, chocolate, warm, anisic, vanilla, cinnamon, clean | |
OR10A5 | - | 7.5 6 | candy, warm, cinnamon | ||
OR10H2 | -6 2 | 0.7916 2 | gluey | candy, warm, lavender, cinnamon | |
OR2B11 | -6 2 | 0.5195 2 | coffee-bold7 |
candy, medicinal, rubbery, coffee, cabbage, warm, chicken, tobacco, coumarinic, cinnamon, earthy, tonka, eggy, onion, orang | |
OR2J2 | - | 5 6 | smooth7 |
tart, carnation, warm, clove, sweet, hay, cinnamon | |
OR9G1 | -4.75 2 | 0.3684 2 | spicy | malty, carnation, candy, warm, clove, cinnamon | |
OR2C1 | -4 2 | 1.4653 2 | rubbery | sulfurous, skunk, roasted, meaty | |
OR52D1 | - | 2.7919 3 | ethereal7 |
cheesy, anise, orange, sour, rancid, sweet, dairy, sharp, pineapple, waxy, fruity, sweaty, banana | |
OR7D4 | - | 0.2 4 | animalic4 |
animal |
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.
3.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
4.) Keller A, Zhuang H, Chi Q, Vosshall LB, Matsunami H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):468-72. doi: 10.1038/nature06162. Epub 2007 Sep 16. PMID: 17873857.
5.) D. Gonzalez-Kristeller, J.B.P. do Nascimento, P.A.F. Galante, B. Malnic, Identification of agonists for a group of human odorant receptors, Front. Pharmacol. 6 (2015)
6.) Fukutani, Y., Koshizawa, T., & Yohda, M. (2021). Application of Vapor Phase Stimulation Method for Screening of Human Odorant Receptors Responding to Cinnamaldehyde. Sensors and Materials, 33(12), 4203-4210.
7.) PrimaryOdors.org differential experiment.
References for aroma perceptual qualities should not be taken to indicate that the authors of outside studies necessarily assigned aroma notes to the neurons that receive input from any given receptor. Rather, the findings of outside studies often constitute the information on which we base our own perceptual quality assignments.