SMILES:
CCCCCCO
Aroma Description:
ethereal, fusel, oily, fruity, alcoholic, sweet, green, pungent, apple_skin1
| Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR2W1 | -4.85 4 | 9 4 | fatty, sweet, herbal, cucumber, orange, tart, mimosa, spicy, coumarinic, passionfruit | |
| OR5P3 | -3.76 4 | 9.5 4 | mimosa, hawthorn, coumarinic, hay, spearmint, caraway, orangeflower, naphthyl, acacia, blueberry | |
| OR1G1 | - | 3.5533 2 | Y | waxy, tart, orange, sweet, aldehydic, fresh, citrus, clean, medicinal, anise |
| OR10A6 | - | 1.9231 6 | floral, honey, rhubarb, neroli, cyclamen, cinnamyl, hyacinth, rose, dirty, balsamic | |
| OR8D2 | - | 1.7308 6 | fusel, alcoholic, ethereal, woody, pungent | |
| OR52D1 | - | 1.5228 2 | anise, cheesy, orange, sweet, dairy, sour, rancid, waxy, tart, sharp | |
| OR51E1 | - | 0 3, 0 4 | ||
| OR10J5 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR1A1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2C1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2J2 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR51L1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR5A1 | - | 0 5 | ||
| OR5A2 | - | 0 5 | ||
| OR5AN1 | - | 0 5 | ||
| OR5I1 | - | 0 6 |
SMILES:
CCCCCCO
Aroma Description:
ethereal, fusel, oily, fruity, alcoholic, sweet, green, pungent, apple_skin
Dock Score: This is a measure of whether the algorithm thinks the odorant is an agonist of the receptor.
Affinity: The binding affinity, in kJ/mol, of the ligand docked in the active or inactive model, whichever is greater.
A100: A measure of the degree of activation of the receptor. See
Ibrahim et al (2019).
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
3.) YOSHIFUMI FUJITA, TOMOKO TAKAHASHI, AKIKO SUZUKI, KAYO KAWASHIMA, FUTOSHI NARA & RYUTA KOISHI (2007) Deorphanization of Dresden G Protein-Coupled Receptor for an Odorant Receptor, Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction, 27:4, 323-334, DOI: 10.1080/10799890701534180
4.) Saito H, Chi Q, Zhuang H, Matsunami H, Mainland JD. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal. 2009 Mar 3;2(60):ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000016. PMID: 19261596; PMCID: PMC2774247.
5.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Jun Deguchi, Hu Jieying et al. Diverse yet selective tuning of an odorant receptor for sensing four classes of musk compounds, 03 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1916850/v1]
6.) Ashti Baghaei, K. (2015). Large scale analysis of olfactory receptors with highly genetically variations in relation with specific anosmia (Doctoral dissertation, Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Diss., 2013).