SMILES:
CC1=C(C(CCC1)(C)C)C=CC(=O)C
Aroma Description:
beeswax, berry, floral, fruity, sweet, tropical, woody1
fragrant, floral, sour, acid, vinegar, sharp, pungent2
| Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Hypothesized PQ | Associated Perceptual Qualities (PQs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR5A1 | -4.3 5, -5.35 14 | 10 5, 10 10 | sweet-floral2 |
vinegar, amber, natural, sharp, sour, animal, berry, musk | |
| OR51E2 | -4.27 3, -7.5 8 | 0.3843 3, 5.9375 8 | acetic17 |
vinegar, sharp, orris | |
| OR5A2 | -3.5 5 | 10 5, 0 10 | musky10 |
musk, animal | |
| OR4D6 | -3.4 5 | 9.4737 5 | (insufficient data) | ||
| OR4D9 | -3.4 5 | 8.9474 5 | vinegar, sharp, sour, berry | ||
| OR2W3 | - | 6.0465 12 | zesty17 |
lemon, muguet, watery, cumin, citrus, vinegar, natural | |
| OR2B3 | -3 6 | - | malty, corn, carnation, pungent, hazelnut, vinegar, clove | ||
| OR4D11 | -3.1 5 | 2.1053 5 | (insufficient data) | ||
| OR52D1 | - | 4.0609 4 | ethereal17 |
cheesy, anise, orange, sour, rancid, sweet, dairy, sharp, pineapple, waxy, fruity, sweaty, banana | |
| OR4D10 | -3.2 5 | 1.5789 5 | (insufficient data) | ||
| OR5AN1 | -2.8 5 | 1.0526 5, 0 10 | musky18 |
musk, powdery, animal | |
| VN1R1 | - | 2.9167 7 | cozy | lactonic, natural, tropical, jasmine, oily, spearmint, caraway | |
| OR1G1 | - | 1.5228 4 | waxy17 |
waxy, orange, tart, aldehydic, sweet, clean, citrus, fresh, anise, dusty, fruity, medicinal, fatty, oily | |
| OR4D1 | - | 0 9 | |||
| OR7A5 | - | 0 9 | |||
| OR2T11 | - | 0 11 | Y | ||
| OR10A6 | - | 0 13 | |||
| OR11H4 | - | 0 13 | |||
| OR2AG2 | - | 0 13 | |||
| OR2W1 | - | -0.1626 15 | |||
| OR8H1 | - | -0.6504 15 | |||
| OR5K1 | - | -0.4065 15, -0.4 16 |
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) S.R. Jaeger, J.F. McRae, C.M. Bava, M.K. Beresford, D. Hunter, Y. Jia, S.L. Chheang, D. Jin, M. Peng, J.C. Gamble et al, A Mendelian Trait for Olfactory Sensitivity Affects Odor Experience and Food Selection, Curr. Biol. 23 (2013) 1601-1605.
3.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.
4.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
5.) S.R. Jaeger, J.F. McRae, C.M. Bava, M.K. Beresford, D. Hunter, Y. Jia, S.L. Chheang, D. Jin, M. Peng, J.C. Gamble et al, A Mendelian Trait for Olfactory Sensitivity Affects Odor Experience and Food Selection, Curr. Biol. 23 (2013) 1601-1605.
6.) D. Gonzalez-Kristeller, J.B.P. do Nascimento, P.A.F. Galante, B. Malnic, Identification of agonists for a group of human odorant receptors, Front. Pharmacol. 6 (2015)
7.) I. Wallrabenstein, J. Gerber, S. Rasche, I. Croy, S. Kurtenbach, T. Hummel, H. Hatt, The smelling of Hedione results in sex-differentiated human brain activity, NeuroImage, Volume 113, 2015, Pages 365-373, ISSN 1053-8119
8.) Sanz G., Leray I., Grébert D., Antoine S., Acquistapace A., Muscat A., Boukadiri A., Mir L. M. Structurally related odorant ligands of the olfactory receptor OR51E2 differentially promote metastasis emergence and tumor growth. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 4330-4341.
9.) Hartmann C, Triller A, Spehr M, Dittrich R, Hatt H, Buettner A. Sperm-Activating Odorous Substances in Human Follicular Fluid and Vaginal Secretion: Identification by Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry and Ca2 Imaging. Chempluschem 78: 695–702, 2013. doi:10.1002/cplu.201300008
10.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Jun Deguchi, Hu Jieying et al. Diverse yet selective tuning of an odorant receptor for sensing four classes of musk compounds, 03 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1916850/v1]
11.) Antagonistic interactions between odorants alter human odor perception Yosuke Fukutani, Masashi Abe, Haruka Saito, Ryo Eguchi, Toshiaki Tazawa, Claire A. de March, Masafumi Yohda, Hiroaki Matsunami bioRxiv 2022.08.02.502184; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.02.502184
12.) Huang, J., Lam, H., Koziol-White, C., Limjunyawong, N., Kim, D., Kim, N., ... & An, S. S. (2020). The odorant receptor OR2W3 on airway smooth muscle evokes bronchodilation via a cooperative chemosensory tradeoff between TMEM16A and CFTR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(45), 28485-28495.
13.) Duroux R, Mandeau A, Guiraudie-Capraz G, Quesnel Y, Loing E. A Rose Extract Protects the Skin against Stress Mediators: A Potential Role of Olfactory Receptors. Molecules. 2020 Oct 16;25(20):4743. doi: 10.3390/molecules25204743. PMID: 33081083; PMCID: PMC7587601.
14.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.
15.) Aya Kato, Naoko Saito (2015) Odor control agent. JP5798382B2
16.) Aya Kato, Naoko Saito, Michiaki Inoue, Kayoko Nomizu (2015) Method of identifying an agent for inhibiting odor of pyrazine derivatives US9057090B2
17.) PrimaryOdors.org differential experiment.
18.) M. Shirasu, K. Yoshikawa, Y. Takai, A. Nakashima, H. Takeuchi, H. Sakano, K. Touhara, Olfactory receptor and neural pathway responsible for highly selective sensing of musk odors, Neuron 81 (2014) 165-178.
References for aroma perceptual qualities should not be taken to indicate that the authors of outside studies necessarily assigned aroma notes to the neurons that receive input from any given receptor. Rather, the findings of outside studies often constitute the information on which we base our own perceptual quality assignments.