☰
 

SMILES:
COc1ccc(C=O)cc1

Aroma Description:
sweet, powdery, mimosa, floral, hawthorn, balsamic, vanilla, anise, woody, coumarinic, creamy, spicy1

Receptor Expression log10 EC50 Adj. Top Antagonist? Correlated Perceptual Qualities
OR5P3 100 -4.7 4 8.8235 4  mimosa, hawthorn, spearmint, coumarinic, hay, sweet, acacia, orangeflower, powdery, naphthyl
OR2W1 53 -3.628 6 -  sweet, tart, hay, fatty, coumarinic, orange, peony, cinnamon, herbal, tonka
OR51T1 76 -4.52 4 2.5882 4  spearmint, dairy, caraway, orangeflower, sharp, neroli, milky, creamy, blueberry, minty
OR8B3 88 -4.2 4 2.5882 4  hawthorn, orangeflower, mimosa, neroli, spearmint, coumarinic, anise, sweet, naphthyl, powdery
OR2J2 92 -3.5 4 2.2353 4  tart, sweet, carnation, hay, orange, warm, cinnamon, clove, coumarinic
OR13C2 100 -3.6 4 1.7647 4  hawthorn, anise, mimosa, coumarinic, vanilla
OR6P1 65 -4.16 3 0.3517 3  hyacinth, honey, hawthorn, sweet, mimosa, vanilla, floral, coumarinic, cocoa, cyclamen
OR10G4 88 -3.3 4 1.7647 4  vanilla, carnation, clove
OR1L6 100 -3.4 4 1.1765 4  (insufficient data)
OR10A6 100 -3.5 4 0.8824 4  peach, sweet, coconut, floral, lactonic, cyclamen, neroli, waxy, dairy, honey
OR2J3 100 -3.3 4 0.8824 4  tart, hay, sweet, foliage, passionfruit, cinnamon, warm, blackcurrant, coumarinic, candy
OR1A1 73 -3.3 4 0.8235 4  sweet, citrus, fresh, rose, herbal, waxy, orange, spearmint, floral, aldehydic
OR5K1 100 -3.3 4 0.2941 4  hazelnut, nutty, peanut, roasted, carnation, cocoa, almond
OR8B4 61 - 2.6923 5  hawthorn, mimosa, coumarinic, anise, sweet, vanilla
OR52D1 100 - 2.6396 2  dairy, cheesy, anise, milky, creamy, sour, sharp, peach, lactonic, rancid
OR1G1 61 - 0.1523 2  sweet, waxy, citrus, fresh, tart, orange, aldehydic, floral, rose, fatty
OR5I1 46 - 0 5   
 

SMILES:
COc1ccc(C=O)cc1

Aroma Description:
sweet, powdery, mimosa, floral, hawthorn, balsamic, vanilla, anise, woody, coumarinic, creamy, spicy

Receptor Expr.% Agonist? Dock Score Known agonist Correlated Perceptual Qualities

Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.

1.) The Good Scents Company

2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002

3.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.

4.) Ieki T, Yamanaka Y, Yoshikawa K (2022) Functional analysis of human olfactory receptors with a high basal activity using LNCaP cell line. PLOS ONE 17(4): e0267356.

5.) Ashti Baghaei, K. (2015). Large scale analysis of olfactory receptors with highly genetically variations in relation with specific anosmia (Doctoral dissertation, Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Diss., 2013).

6.) Franziska Haag, Antonella Di Pizio, Dietmar Krautwurst, The key food odorant receptive range of broadly tuned receptor OR2W1. Food Chemistry 375 (2022) 131680
×
 
 

Code version:
 

Docker used:
 

Files:
Active model: text 3D download
Inactive model: text 3D download
Active dock: text 3D download
Inactive dock: text 3D download
JSON entry: text   download