☰
 

SMILES:
C1=CC=C2C(=C1)C=CC=N2

Aroma Description:
earthy, medicinal, musty, rubbery, tobacco1

Receptor log10 EC50 Adj. Top Antagonist? Correlated Perceptual Qualities
OR2B11 -5 2, -5.4 5 7.3333 4, 10 5  tonka, medicinal, rubbery, coumarinic, hay, tobacco, candy, seafood, earthy, coffee
OR2A25 -6 2 1.108 2, 2.2667 4  lavender, rummy, cooling, medicinal, rubbery, winey, soapy
OR1G1 - 6.4467 3  waxy, tart, orange, sweet, aldehydic, fresh, citrus, clean, medicinal, anise
OR1A1 - 3.6667 4  herbal, caraway, passionfruit, spearmint, weedy, orange, hay, fresh, waxy, citrus
OR5P3 - 3 4  mimosa, hawthorn, coumarinic, hay, spearmint, caraway, orangeflower, naphthyl, acacia, blueberry
OR2J2 - 2.1667 4  tart, carnation, orange, warm, hay, clove, cinnamon, sweet
OR5K1 - 1.6667 4  hazelnut, nutty, peanut, roasted, cocoa
OR52D1 - 0.6091 3  anise, cheesy, orange, sweet, dairy, sour, rancid, waxy, tart, sharp
OR10G7 - 0.0667 4  clove, carnation, smoky
OR8K3 - 0.0667 4  mentholic, currant, plum
OR10G3 - 0 4   
OR10J5 - 0 4   
OR11A1 - 0 4   
OR1C1 - 0 4   
OR2J3 - 0 4   
OR2W1 - 0 4   
OR51E1 - 0 4   
OR51L1 - 0 4   
OR56A4 - 0 4   
OR8D1 - -0.0317 4   
 

SMILES:
C1=CC=C2C(=C1)C=CC=N2

Aroma Description:
earthy, medicinal, musty, rubbery, tobacco

Receptor Dock Score Affinity A100 Correlated Perceptual Qualities
OR51E1 0 0 (unknown)  

Dock Score: This is a measure of whether the algorithm thinks the odorant is an agonist of the receptor.
Affinity: The binding affinity, in kJ/mol, of the ligand docked in the active or inactive model, whichever is greater.
A100: A measure of the degree of activation of the receptor. See Ibrahim et al (2019).

1.) The Good Scents Company

2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.

3.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002

4.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821

5.) J.D. Mainland, A. Keller, Y.R. Li, T. Zhou, C. Trimmer, L.L. Snyder, A.H. Moberly, K.A. Adipietro, W.L.L. Liu, H. Zhuang et al, The missense of smell: functional variability in the human odorant receptor repertoire, Nat. Neurosci. 17 (2014) 114-120