SMILES:
CC(=CCCC(C)(C=C)O)C

Aroma Description:
blueberry, bois_de_rose, citrus, floral, green, rose, sweet, woody1

Receptor log10 EC50 Adj. Top Antagonist? Hypothesized PQ Associated Perceptual Qualities (PQs)
OR1C1 -7.86 2, -2.79 3, -2.57 4, -2.8 8, -6.09 11 1.4377 2, 10 3, 0.5294 8  lactonic coumarinic, tonka, blueberry, hay, bois_de_rose
OR10A6 -6.25 10 -  bland-fatty floral, cinnamyl, cyclamen, rhubarb, neroli, hyacinth, dirty, balsamic, cinnamon, honey, muguet, rose
OR2AG2 -5.25 10 -  pollinic?12
cinnamyl, cinnamon, hyacinth, floral, balsamic
VN1R5 - 9 6    tart, orange, cloth, laundered, aldehydic, peel, caraway, spearmint, waxy
OR1D2 -4.26 7 -  clean-bright12
rose, peach, bois_de_rose, lactonic, fresh, citrus, floral, coconut, waxy, creamy, blueberry, clean, ketonic, lime
OR13C3 -8.14 2 0.1149 2    (insufficient data)
VN1R3 - 7.3 6    peel, orange, aldehydic
OR51T1 -4.4 8 3.8235 8  juicy spearmint, orangeflower, caraway, neroli, minty, blueberry, bready, bois_de_rose
OR1N2 -3.83 2 0.1061 2    (insufficient data)
OR1A1 -3.4 8 -1.1667 4, 0.7059 8  leafy12
caraway, herbal, orange, cognac, weedy, spearmint, mushroom, hay, licorice, fatty
OR13A1 -2.8 2 0.1774 2    (insufficient data)
OR2A25 -2.06 3 0.5833 3, 0 4  tabagique12
lavender, medicinal
OR2W3 - 0.9302 9  zesty12
lemon, muguet, watery, cumin, citrus, vinegar, natural
OR7D4 - 0.2 5  animalic5
animal
OR10G3 - 0 4     
OR10G7 - 0 4     
OR10J5 - 0 4     
OR11A1 - 0 4     
OR2B11 - 0 4     
OR2J2 - 0 4     
OR2J3 - 0 4     
OR2W1 - 0 4     
OR51E1 - 0 4     
OR51L1 - 0 4     
OR56A4 - 0 4     
OR5K1 - 0 4     
OR8D1 - 0 4     
OR8K3 - 0 4     
OR11H4 - 0 10     
OR5P3 - -2.2667 4     

1.) The Good Scents Company

2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.

3.) C. Trimmer, A. Keller, N. R. Murphy, L. L. Snyder, J. R. Willer, M. H. Nagai, N. Katsanis, L. B. Vosshall, H. Matsunami, and J. D. Mainland Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception PNAS | May 7, 2019 | vol. 116 | no. 19 | 9475–9480

4.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821

5.) Keller A, Zhuang H, Chi Q, Vosshall LB, Matsunami H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):468-72. doi: 10.1038/nature06162. Epub 2007 Sep 16. PMID: 17873857.

6.) Krautwurst D. Human olfactory receptor families and their odorants. Chem Biodivers. 2008 Jun;5(6):842-52. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200890099. PMID: 18618407.

7.) Veithen, A.; Wilin, F.; Philippeau, M.; Chatelain, P. OR1D2 is a broadly tuned human olfactory receptor. Chem. Senses 2015, 40, 262–263.

8.) Ieki T, Yamanaka Y, Yoshikawa K (2022) Functional analysis of human olfactory receptors with a high basal activity using LNCaP cell line. PLOS ONE 17(4): e0267356.

9.) Huang, J., Lam, H., Koziol-White, C., Limjunyawong, N., Kim, D., Kim, N., ... & An, S. S. (2020). The odorant receptor OR2W3 on airway smooth muscle evokes bronchodilation via a cooperative chemosensory tradeoff between TMEM16A and CFTR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(45), 28485-28495.

10.) Duroux R, Mandeau A, Guiraudie-Capraz G, Quesnel Y, Loing E. A Rose Extract Protects the Skin against Stress Mediators: A Potential Role of Olfactory Receptors. Molecules. 2020 Oct 16;25(20):4743. doi: 10.3390/molecules25204743. PMID: 33081083; PMCID: PMC7587601.

11.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.

12.) PrimaryOdors.org differential experiment.

References for aroma perceptual qualities should not be taken to indicate that the authors of outside studies necessarily assigned aroma notes to the neurons that receive input from any given receptor. Rather, the findings of outside studies often constitute the information on which we base our own perceptual quality assignments.