
SMILES:
CC12CCC3C(C1CC=C2)CCC4C3(CCC(=O)C4)C
Aroma Description:
animal, musky1
Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Hypothesized PQ | Associated Perceptual Qualities (PQs) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR7D4 | -5.39 2, -5.92 4 | 1.0801 2, 10 4 | animalic4 |
animal | |
OR4D1 | - | 10 6 | animal | ||
OR8B2 | -4.74 2 | 1.0966 2 | animal | ||
OR2J2 | -5 2 | 0.2033 2, 0 3 | smooth8 |
tart, carnation, warm, clove, sweet, hay, cinnamon | |
OR7C1 | -4.54 2 | 0.1833 2 | animal | ||
OR4X2 | -4.52 2 | 0.1983 2 | grape | ||
OR6Q1 | -4.46 2 | 0.1408 2 | (insufficient data) | ||
OR4F17 | -4.32 2 | 0.1822 2 | clove, animal | ||
OR5R1 | -4.15 2 | 0.1662 2 | cerisic | spearmint, acacia, coumarinic, hawthorn, tonka, mimosa, almond | |
OR1B1 | - | 3.8462 7 | cotton_candy, jammy, caramellic | ||
OR10A5 | -3.26 2 | 0.7467 2 | candy, warm, cinnamon | ||
OR10A6 | -3.06 2 | 0.4989 2 | bland-fatty | floral, cinnamyl, cyclamen, rhubarb, neroli, hyacinth, dirty, balsamic, cinnamon, honey, muguet, rose | |
OR9G1 | -2.67 2 | 0.0602 2 | spicy | malty, carnation, candy, warm, clove, cinnamon | |
OR10G6 | -2.42 2 | 0.0848 2 | balsamic | fusel, fermented | |
OR1C1 | - | 1 3 | lactonic | coumarinic, tonka, blueberry, hay, bois_de_rose | |
OR10G3 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR10G7 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR10J5 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR11A1 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR2A25 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR2B11 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR2J3 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR51E1 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR51L1 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR56A4 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR5K1 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR8D1 | - | 0 3 | |||
OR8K3 | - | 0 3 | |||
VN1R1 | - | 0 5 | |||
OR5I1 | - | 0 7 | |||
OR1A1 | - | -1.4333 3 | |||
OR2W1 | - | -2.3333 3 | |||
OR5P3 | - | -2.6667 3 |
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.
3.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821
4.) Keller A, Zhuang H, Chi Q, Vosshall LB, Matsunami H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):468-72. doi: 10.1038/nature06162. Epub 2007 Sep 16. PMID: 17873857.
5.) I. Wallrabenstein, J. Gerber, S. Rasche, I. Croy, S. Kurtenbach, T. Hummel, H. Hatt, The smelling of Hedione results in sex-differentiated human brain activity, NeuroImage, Volume 113, 2015, Pages 365-373, ISSN 1053-8119
6.) Hartmann C, Triller A, Spehr M, Dittrich R, Hatt H, Buettner A. Sperm-Activating Odorous Substances in Human Follicular Fluid and Vaginal Secretion: Identification by Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry and Ca2 Imaging. Chempluschem 78: 695–702, 2013. doi:10.1002/cplu.201300008
7.) Ashti Baghaei, K. (2015). Large scale analysis of olfactory receptors with highly genetically variations in relation with specific anosmia (Doctoral dissertation, Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Diss., 2013).
8.) PrimaryOdors.org differential experiment.
References for aroma perceptual qualities should not be taken to indicate that the authors of outside studies necessarily assigned aroma notes to the neurons that receive input from any given receptor. Rather, the findings of outside studies often constitute the information on which we base our own perceptual quality assignments.