☰
 

SMILES:
CCCCCC(=O)C

Aroma Description:
banana, cheesy, coconut, creamy, fruity, green, herbal, ketonic, spicy, sweet, waxy, woody1

Receptor log10 EC50 Adj. Top Antagonist? Correlated Perceptual Qualities
OR2W1 -5.14 5, -7.52 7 -  fatty, sweet, herbal, cucumber, orange, tart, mimosa, spicy, coumarinic, passionfruit
OR1A1 -4.4 5 -1.6333 4, 9.8 5  herbal, caraway, passionfruit, spearmint, weedy, orange, hay, fresh, waxy, citrus
OR1D2 -3.78 6 -  rose, peach, bois_de_rose, citrus, floral, fresh, lactonic, waxy, lime, blueberry
OR4K2 -1.62 2 0.0324 2  storax, animal, clove, cortex, malty, musk, natural, foliage, almond, powdery
OR1G1 - 1.0152 3  waxy, tart, orange, sweet, aldehydic, fresh, citrus, clean, medicinal, anise
OR52D1 - 1.0152 3  anise, cheesy, orange, sweet, dairy, sour, rancid, waxy, tart, sharp
OR5K1 - 0.1333 4  hazelnut, nutty, peanut, roasted, cocoa
OR10G3 - 0.0333 4  vanilla, chocolate, creamy
OR10G7 - 0 4   
OR10J5 - 0 4, 0 5   
OR11A1 - 0 4   
OR1C1 - 0 4   
OR2A25 - 0 4   
OR2B11 - 0 4   
OR2J2 - 0 4, 0 5   
OR2J3 - 0 4   
OR51E1 - 0 4, 0 5   
OR51L1 - 0 4, 0 5   
OR56A4 - 0 4   
OR8K3 - 0 4   
OR2C1 - 0 5   
OR8D1 - -0.025 4   
OR5P3 - -2.3333 4, 0 5   
 

SMILES:
CCCCCC(=O)C

Aroma Description:
banana, cheesy, coconut, creamy, fruity, green, herbal, ketonic, spicy, sweet, waxy, woody

Receptor Agonist? Dock Score Pose1 LSRB - LSP Correlated Perceptual Qualities

Dock Score: This is a measure of whether the algorithm thinks the odorant is an agonist of the receptor.
Affinity: The binding affinity, in kJ/mol, of the ligand docked in the active or inactive model, whichever is greater.
LSP: Ligand Surface Polarity, i.e. how much of the ligand's surface is hydrophilic.
LSRB: Ligand Surface Receptor Binding, i.e. how much of the ligand's surface interacts with receptor atoms.

1.) The Good Scents Company

2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.

3.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002

4.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821

5.) Saito H, Chi Q, Zhuang H, Matsunami H, Mainland JD. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal. 2009 Mar 3;2(60):ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000016. PMID: 19261596; PMCID: PMC2774247.

6.) Veithen, A.; Wilin, F.; Philippeau, M.; Chatelain, P. OR1D2 is a broadly tuned human olfactory receptor. Chem. Senses 2015, 40, 262–263.

7.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.