aldehyde C-6
SMILES:
CCCCCC=O
Aroma Description:
aldehydic, fatty, fresh, fruity, grass, green, leafy, sweaty1
| Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR2W1 | -5.1 3, -6.52 8 | 10 3, 0 11 | fatty, sweet, herbal, cucumber, orange, tart, mimosa, spicy, coumarinic, passionfruit | |
| OR1G1 | - | 3.0457 2 | Y | waxy, tart, orange, sweet, aldehydic, fresh, citrus, clean, medicinal, anise |
| OR8B4 | - | 1.5385 7 | hawthorn, anise, mimosa, coumarinic, vanilla | |
| OR4D11 | - | 1.5 10 | oily, fatty, fresh, citrus, fruity, vinegar, floral, sweet, sharp | |
| OR1J2 | - | 0.5556 9 | cognac, ozone, aldehydic, peel | |
| OR52D1 | - | 0.0508 2 | anise, cheesy, orange, sweet, dairy, sour, rancid, waxy, tart, sharp | |
| OR10J5 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR1A1 | - | 0 3, 0 4, 0 5 | ||
| OR2C1 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2J2 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR51E1 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR51L1 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR5P3 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR1A2 | - | 0 4, 0 5 | ||
| OR5A1 | - | 0 6 | ||
| OR5AN1 | - | 0 6 | ||
| OR5I1 | - | 0 7 |
aldehyde C-6
SMILES:
CCCCCC=O
Aroma Description:
aldehydic, fatty, fresh, fruity, grass, green, leafy, sweaty
| Receptor | Dock Score | Affinity | A100 | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score: This is a measure of whether the algorithm thinks the odorant is an agonist of the receptor.
Affinity: The binding affinity, in kJ/mol, of the ligand docked in the active or inactive model, whichever is greater.
A100: A measure of the degree of activation of the receptor. See
Ibrahim et al (2019).
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
3.) Saito H, Chi Q, Zhuang H, Matsunami H, Mainland JD. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal. 2009 Mar 3;2(60):ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000016. PMID: 19261596; PMCID: PMC2774247.
4.) Silva Teixeira CS, Silva Ferreira AC, Cerqueira NM. Studying Haloanisoles Interaction with Olfactory Receptors. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2016 Jul 20;7(7):870-85. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00335. Epub 2016 May 9. PMID: 27092849.
5.) Schmiedeberg K, Shirokova E, Weber HP, Schilling B, Meyerhof W, Krautwurst D. Structural determinants of odorant recognition by the human olfactory receptors OR1A1 and OR1A2. J Struct Biol. 2007 Sep;159(3):400-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 May 25. PMID: 17601748.
6.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Jun Deguchi, Hu Jieying et al. Diverse yet selective tuning of an odorant receptor for sensing four classes of musk compounds, 03 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1916850/v1]
7.) Ashti Baghaei, K. (2015). Large scale analysis of olfactory receptors with highly genetically variations in relation with specific anosmia (Doctoral dissertation, Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Diss., 2013).
8.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.
9.) Lim J. H., J. Park, E. H. Oh, H. J. Ko, S. Hong, and Park, T. H. (2014) Nanovesicle-based bioelectronic nose for the diagnosis of lung cancer from human blood. Adv. Healthcare Mater., 3: 360–366.
10.) Cho, S.W., Ko, H.J. & Park, T.H. Identification of a Lung Cancer Biomarker Using a Cancer Cell Line and Screening of Olfactory Receptors for Biomarker Detection. Biotechnol Bioproc E 26, 55–62 (2021).
11.) Franziska Haag, Antonella Di Pizio, Dietmar Krautwurst, The key food odorant receptive range of broadly tuned receptor OR2W1. Food Chemistry 375 (2022) 131680