
SMILES:
C1=CC=C2C(=C1)C=CC(=O)O2
Aroma Description:
coumarinic, hay, sweet, tonka1
Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Hypothesized PQ | Associated Perceptual Qualities (PQs) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR2J2 | -3.68 6, -5 9 | 5.8333 5, 9.7 6 | smooth10 |
tart, carnation, warm, clove, sweet, hay, cinnamon | |
OR2W1 | -4.06 6, -5.3 9 | 2.3333 5, 9.5 6 | allyl-demimetallic10 |
herbal, fatty, sweet, tart, banana, mushroom, orange, fresh, rancid, cherry, acacia, orangeflower | |
OR1C1 | -6 2 | 2.6667 5 | lactonic | coumarinic, tonka, blueberry, hay, bois_de_rose | |
OR5P3 | -5.44 2, -2.85 5, -5.25 6 | 6.357 2, 2.8333 5, 9.7 6 | plastchoulic10 |
mimosa, hawthorn, hay, pungent, orangeflower, acacia, blueberry, neroli, powdery, peppery | |
OR2B11 | -3.45 2, -2.14 5, -3.5 7 | 1.8005 2, 9.3333 5, 9 7 | coffee-bold10 |
candy, medicinal, rubbery, coffee, cabbage, warm, chicken, tobacco, coumarinic, cinnamon, earthy, tonka, eggy, onion, orang | |
OR5R1 | -5 3 | 7.7895 3 | cerisic | spearmint, acacia, coumarinic, hawthorn, tonka, mimosa, almond | |
OR11H12 | -4.1 3 | 7.8947 3 | powdery | spearmint, acacia, hawthorn, coumarinic, tonka, mimosa, almond | |
OR2J1 | -7.85 2 | 0.0647 2 | coumarinic, tonka, hay | ||
OR1G1 | - | 3.2487 4 | waxy10 |
waxy, orange, tart, aldehydic, sweet, clean, citrus, fresh, anise, dusty, fruity, medicinal, fatty, oily | |
OR4N2 | -2.29 2 | 0.4578 2 | coumarinic, tonka, hay | ||
OR2J3 | - | 1.8333 5 | jagged10 |
warm, candy, cinnamon, currant, hay, foliage | |
OR52D1 | - | 0.9645 4 | ethereal10 |
cheesy, anise, orange, sour, rancid, sweet, dairy, sharp, pineapple, waxy, fruity, sweaty, banana | |
OR10G7 | - | 0.1667 5 | rosinous10 |
clove, carnation, smoky | |
OR10G3 | - | 0 5 | |||
OR10J5 | - | 0 5, 0 6 | |||
OR11A1 | - | 0 5 | |||
OR1A1 | - | 0 5, 0 6 | |||
OR2A25 | - | 0 5 | |||
OR51E1 | - | 0 5, 0 6 | |||
OR51L1 | - | 0 5, 0 6 | |||
OR56A4 | - | 0 5 | |||
OR5K1 | - | 0 5 | |||
OR8D1 | - | 0 5 | |||
OR8K3 | - | 0 5 | |||
OR2C1 | - | 0 6 | |||
TAAR5 | - | -1 8 |
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.
3.) Xiaojing Cong, Wenwen Ren, Jody Pacalon, Claire A. de March, Lun Xu, Hiroaki Matsunami, Yiqun Yu, Jérôme Golebiowski Functions of olfactory receptors are decoded from their sequence https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.06.895540
4.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
5.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821
6.) Saito H, Chi Q, Zhuang H, Matsunami H, Mainland JD. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal. 2009 Mar 3;2(60):ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000016. PMID: 19261596; PMCID: PMC2774247.
7.) J.D. Mainland, A. Keller, Y.R. Li, T. Zhou, C. Trimmer, L.L. Snyder, A.H. Moberly, K.A. Adipietro, W.L.L. Liu, H. Zhuang et al, The missense of smell: functional variability in the human odorant receptor repertoire, Nat. Neurosci. 17 (2014) 114-120
8.) Wallrabenstein I, Singer M, Panten J, Hatt H, Gisselmann G. Timberol® Inhibits TAAR5-Mediated Responses to Trimethylamine and Influences the Olfactory Threshold in Humans. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144704. Published 2015 Dec 18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144704
9.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.
10.) PrimaryOdors.org differential experiment.
References for aroma perceptual qualities should not be taken to indicate that the authors of outside studies necessarily assigned aroma notes to the neurons that receive input from any given receptor. Rather, the findings of outside studies often constitute the information on which we base our own perceptual quality assignments.