nonanoic acid
SMILES:
CCCCCCCCC(=O)[O-]
Aroma Description:
cheesy, dairy, dirty, waxy1
| Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR51E1 | -4.71 4, -3.61 5, -5.3 6 | - | cheesy, sweaty, sour, acidic | |
| OR2W1 | -3.72 5 | 4.6667 3, 9.5 5, 9.0909 8 | fatty, sweet, herbal, cucumber, orange, tart, mimosa, spicy, coumarinic, passionfruit | |
| OR10A6 | - | 8.6364 8 | floral, honey, rhubarb, neroli, cyclamen, cinnamyl, hyacinth, rose, dirty, balsamic | |
| OR56A5 | -4.42 10 | 7.7 10 | rancid, cheesy, buttermilk, sweaty, sour | |
| OR52B2 | -4.08 10 | 1.2 10 | rancid, cheesy, sour, juicy, tart | |
| OR52D1 | - | 2.8934 2 | anise, cheesy, orange, sweet, dairy, sour, rancid, waxy, tart, sharp | |
| OR1G1 | - | 2.7919 2 | waxy, tart, orange, sweet, aldehydic, fresh, citrus, clean, medicinal, anise | |
| OR1C1 | - | 2.3333 3 | blueberry, bois_de_rose | |
| OR10G3 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR10G7 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR10J5 | - | 0 3, 0 5 | ||
| OR11A1 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2A25 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2B11 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2J2 | - | 0 3, 0 5 | ||
| OR2J3 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR51L1 | - | 0 3, 0 5 | ||
| OR56A4 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR5K1 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR8D1 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR8K3 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2C1 | - | 0 5 | ||
| OR51E2 | - | 0 9 | ||
| OR1A1 | - | -1 3, 0 5 | ||
| OR5P3 | - | -2.6 3, 0 5 |
nonanoic acid
SMILES:
CCCCCCCCC(=O)[O-]
Aroma Description:
cheesy, dairy, dirty, waxy
Dock Score: This is a measure of whether the algorithm thinks the odorant is an agonist of the receptor.
Affinity: The binding affinity, in kJ/mol, of the ligand docked in the active or inactive model, whichever is greater.
A100: A measure of the degree of activation of the receptor. See
Ibrahim et al (2019).
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
3.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821
4.) Audouze K, Tromelin A, Le Bon AM, Belloir C, Petersen RK, et al. () Identification of Odorant-Receptor Interactions by Global Mapping of the Human Odorome. PLoS ONE 9(4): e93037. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093037
5.) Saito H, Chi Q, Zhuang H, Matsunami H, Mainland JD. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal. 2009 Mar 3;2(60):ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000016. PMID: 19261596; PMCID: PMC2774247.
6.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.
7.) Halperin Kuhns, V. L., Sanchez, J., Sarver, D. C., Khalil, Z., Rajkumar, P., Marr, K. A., & Pluznick, J. L. (2019). Characterizing novel olfactory receptors expressed in the murine renal cortex. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 317(1), F172-F186.
8.) Aya Kato, Naoko Saito, Etsuji Wakisaka (2016) Method for searching for malodor control agent, malodor control agent, and malodor control method. US9526680B2
9.) Christian B. Billesbølle, Claire A. de March, Wijnand J. C. van der Velden, Ning Ma, Jeevan Tewari, Claudia Llinas del Torrent, Linus Li, Bryan Faust, Nagarajan Vaidehi, Hiroaki Matsunami, Aashish Manglik. Structural basis of odorant recognition by a human odorant receptor. bioRxiv 2022.12.20.520951; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.20.520951
10.) Chatelain Pierre, Veithen Alex, Olfactory Receptors involved in the perception of sweat carboxylic acids and the use thereof. WO 2014/191047